A practical database trade-off guide for SaaS starters: SQLite/libSQL, PostgreSQL, Drizzle, Prisma, migrations, hosting, and buyer expectations.
Database choices in SaaS starters are more emotional than they should be.
Turso, PostgreSQL, Drizzle, Prisma, Supabase, Neon, and SQLite all have real strengths. The right choice depends on what the starter optimizes for: local setup, operational familiarity, edge reads, schema control, ecosystem, or enterprise expectations.
This is not a purity argument. It is a trade-off map.
Turso is hosted libSQL, a SQLite-compatible database with cloud features. Drizzle is a lightweight TypeScript ORM with explicit schema definitions and SQL-like query builders.
The appeal:
file:local.db.The cost:
Turso + Drizzle is a strong default when you value small setup and explicit TypeScript code.
PostgreSQL is the familiar production default for many SaaS teams. Prisma is widely adopted and has a comfortable schema/client workflow.
The appeal:
The cost:
PostgreSQL + Prisma is a strong default when team familiarity and ecosystem matter more than minimal setup.
This middle path is increasingly attractive precisely because it refuses to pick a side: you get PostgreSQL's familiar hosting story and Drizzle's thinner query layer. The trade-off is that you still need a real Postgres instance for local dev — no single-file convenience — and Drizzle's ecosystem, while growing, is smaller than Prisma's. For teams that think in SQL, this is often the most pragmatic option on the table.
A starter should make the default easy without pretending it is universal.
The docs should answer:
The worst answer is silence. Buyers interpret silence as lock-in.
For a fresh database, db:push is convenient.
For production data, generated migrations are safer.
That distinction should be explicit:
# Fresh local database
pnpm db:push
# Production changes
pnpm db:generate
pnpm db:migrate
Most SaaS teams can start fast and become stricter when real data appears.
Regardless of provider, application code should import one database client:
import { db } from '@/lib/db';
The app should not know whether the active provider is Turso or PostgreSQL. Provider selection belongs in database initialization, not in every route handler.
That boundary matters more than the default.
If fast local setup and multi-region reads matter most, start with Turso + Drizzle. If your team already knows Postgres, or your customers expect it, use Postgres — with Prisma if you want the generated-client ergonomics, or Drizzle if you'd rather write something closer to SQL. None of these is objectively correct. The mature answer isn't "this database is best" — it's picking a sensible default and documenting the escape hatch.
Codapult defaults to Turso + Drizzle and documents PostgreSQL via DB_PROVIDER=postgres; the database docs cover setup and migration paths.